EU ministers to consider call to ban Russian tourists
BRUSSELS, Belgium (AFP) – EU foreign ministers are due to discuss a call by Ukraine this week to ban Russian tourists from visiting Europe.
The idea, which will be considered at a two-day meeting from Tuesday in Prague, has divided EU countries, with some wholeheartedly endorsing it while others resist, fearing it could shut down the door to Russian dissidents fleeing their homeland.
Some EU countries neighboring Russia have already decided to ban or limit visas for Russians, but no EU-wide ban is in place yet.
In February, the European Union restricted visas in certain categories for Russians linked to the Kremlin, including for civil servants, holders of diplomatic passports and business leaders. But tourist visas were still allowed.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky is now calling on the West to close its borders to all Russians, including tourists, saying they should ‘live in their own world until they change their philosophy’.
Ukrainian Foreign Minister Dmytro Kuleba said: “The Russians overwhelmingly support the war, encourage missile strikes on Ukrainian cities and [the] murder of Ukrainians. Let Russian tourists enjoy Russia then.
A furious Kremlin responded by calling Kyiv’s call “irrational” and promising retaliation.
Finland, which has Europe’s longest border with Russia, will from Thursday reduce the number of Russian tourist visa applications it processes to just 10% of the usual 1,000 received per day. An outright ban based on an applicant’s nationality is not possible under Finnish law.
This measure will have an impact. Due to EU sanctions closing European airspace to flights from Russia, Russians have overwhelmingly turned to overland travel via Finland to reach other European countries.
EU countries Latvia, Lithuania and Poland stopped issuing new tourist visas to Russians when Kremlin forces invaded Ukraine in late February.
Russian leisure travelers use Schengen visas normally valid in 26 EU and associated countries, including Switzerland and Norway.
Visas generally allow stays of up to 90 days in a continuous period of 180 days.
These 26 countries received around three million Schengen visa applications last year. Russians were the largest group, accounting for 536,000 of them.
Estonia wants EU rules changed to allow it to stop Russians with already issued Schengen visas, regardless of which EU country issued them.
The Czech Republic – which holds the rotating EU presidency – says “the status quo for Russian tourists in times of aggression is inappropriate”.
EU sanctions require unanimity from all 27 member states. One country – Hungary – enjoys friendly relations with Moscow and could veto a bloc-wide visa ban.
On top of that, several EU countries, including France, Germany and Portugal, are insisting that Russian journalists and other civilians fearing persecution will continue to be allowed entry.
And EU foreign policy chief Josep Borrell, who will chair the meeting of EU ministers in Prague, said he believed banning all Russians from entering Europe “is not not a good idea”.
The European Commission insists on the need for humanitarian access for Russian dissidents and says that visa applications must be assessed individually and not according to a general rule.
Lithuania has said that if no EU-wide ban is agreed, it could seek a “regional solution” banning tourists, possibly including Latvia, Estonia, Finland and Poland.
An expert at the European Council on Foreign Relations think tank, Marie Dumoulin, said the call to ban Russians from Europe contains “a dangerous error of analysis”.
“Less than 30% of Russians have a passport and their main travel destinations are Turkey, Egypt and the United Arab Emirates,” she said.
“A ban would have exactly the opposite effect of what is sought. By stigmatizing the Russians, this would fuel the propaganda of the Kremlin which, for years and especially since the offensive in Ukraine, has denounced an alleged “Russophobia” of Westerners.
The EU, she said, should maintain links with Russian civil society and not “lock it into a completely regime-controlled enclosure”.